FY03 Serials Review: Results
The review process identified the lowest priority 25% of serial expenditures (journals, standing orders, and electronic resources) and organized that quartile into three categories reflecting the relative damage to the collections that would be created by their loss. Further information on the review process is available at the main serial review site
- Priority 3.
- These are the titles we believe could be canceled with the least damage to Library services. Some users will be inconvenienced or unserved but the item may be rarely used. Other access options may be available (ILL or document delivery) or the resource may be redundant to some extent.
- Priority 2.
- The cancellation of these titles will more severely damage Library service. A greater number of campus users will be inconvenienced or unserved. Other access options may be limited to ILL; the resource is less redundant.
- Priority 1.
- The cancellation of these titles will cause the greatest damage to Library service. Significant inconvenience for greater numbers of library users would result. The collections would be severely weakened.
