University of Maryland Libraries
||| Technical Services Division |||

Technical Services Program Review
Blue Ribbon Committee

Horizontal Rule
Catalog Management Focused Discussion
January 23, 2001

How non-TSD colleagues utilize the Catalog Management Department.

  • Patrons come to the Circulation Desk with books that have problems, either on the label or something in the system.
  • Help Desk is helpful, timely in responding. Is there an online form?
  • Work with CATM on the transfers and withdrawals for PAL theater materials that should be in McKeldin.
  • Pleased with Help Desk response. When send in email get a response but do not consistently get a response when submitting the paper form.
  • Weeding duplicates because of the lilac slipping. Sending a fair amount of materials to CATM for withdrawal.
  • Shifting materials from HBK to MCK or withdrawing materials from HBK - would like to have list of duplicates. Would like a more systematic about the process.
  • Happy with service of Help Desk, CATM is responsive.
  • Do not interact as much as with the Help Desk as used to (Chemistry). Very few problems.

Issues of interest or concern.

  • Keep paper shelf list to use as back-up because computer does not match reality (Chemistry).
  • Sometimes shows lost for first item and patrons miss an item because they don't go to the next screen.
  • Would like reports on collection areas - to be able to focus on withdrawals, to fill in the gaps, replace items that have been lost or long overdue.
  • Filling out individual forms for withdrawals - can materials be batched if a special project.
  • Date due slips are put in crooked; find wrong call numbers.
  • At least once a month books are received after time expires for 'in processing.'
  • Other campuses are able to put holds on new books before our own patrons see them.
  • New books include all of the paperwork in each book - extra work for Circ to throw away.
  • Would like to understand what the priorities are.

What CATM does well.

  • Donna King always gives a prompt response, always helpful.
  • Staff are willing to answer questions.
  • Generally take care of bumps.
  • It is helpful that EPU lets people know when there are delays.

Suggestions for CATM to do differently or change.

  • What can be done to make the 'in processing' time period an honest reflection of what is happening? This is difficult to convey to patrons.
  • For materials 'in processing', can we go to Technical Services to find book. What is the appropriate response to faculty?
  • Can hold recalls guide the rush process?
  • Is there flexibility in the 'in processing' time period? Carlen says no.
  • Clarify the process of how and when preservation checks out materials.
  • If asking the Help Desk for a response, would like to receive one.
  • Clarify who does what and be able to connect a name with a face and job responsibilities. It is difficult to follow-up if you don't know where an item has gone.
  • Getting responses from the Help Desk - get a copy of the form back with "done" on it.
  • CATM is spending time doing simpler activities (transfers, catalog changes) and don't have time to do more complex things. Branch staff could process simpler problems - save CATM for more difficult stuff. Someone could serve as liaison to CATM.
  • Would like to be able to do internal transfers. Donna will train staff if asked.
  • Technical Services needs to know who to go to for problems.

Ways to get feedback from customers.

  • Look for more opportunities for collaboration.
  • Visit branches to talk.
  • Create a way for groups within Technical Services to meet with rest of the organization. There is a big canyon between subject teams and the rest of the organization. Acquisitions is having regular contact.
  • Set up dialogue between groups - it needs to be two-way.

Question:

Does Collection Management (not CATM) deal with management of the collections or only development?

Horizontal Rule

UM Libraries Home | Technical Services Division | TSD Program Review | Blue Ribbon Committee

© 2001 University of Maryland Libraries
Last Revised: Feb. 5, 2001